Better is better than the Best
Let me start with teh simple assumption that thedestiny of Bad is to be Good, the destiny of Good is to be Better; the Destiny of Better is to be Best. Then what's the Best destined for?
When something is regarded as Good, ther's always the scope for improvements, say from Good to better. Being Good it's always possible ot ameliorate to Better. So now in this fashion Better is truly better than Good.
On the other hand when something is considered to be the Best, it becomes equivalently true that it's pefect in its own state. Since nothing Perfect can ever exist, or as wisely quoth that there's no corner of perfection and room for perfection, the Best only brings out the disillusions of what's regarded as the Best.
Even if we believethat the Best does exist. Now what next after being the Best. The Best leaves no room for improvements. Thence from being the Best one can only grow Better and with no chance to ameliorate furthur, wherefore Best is nothing more than a tenacious folly.
Now considering something to be Better, being Better it provides a ground room for improvements and to ameliorate further, say from Better to Better++. Regarding such infinetesimal ameliorations to Better would still leave it at Better, narrowing the by far margin from Best. Thence the destiny of Better is Better itself and not the Best.
Philosophically considered, its always the human tendency to seek something that's better than the one possesed, no matter what one has or why one needs. Even if its the Best, one still looks up or rather desires (though not the need ) for something thats Better than the Best. To compare and collate the Need with the Absolute scale, and the Desire ( I wont say it as Greed) with the relative scale.
The absolute scale has an end but not the relative scale. Hence when the qualitative mensurations are quantified on a relative scale there can olny be a place for Better and not the Best.
When something is regarded as Good, ther's always the scope for improvements, say from Good to better. Being Good it's always possible ot ameliorate to Better. So now in this fashion Better is truly better than Good.
On the other hand when something is considered to be the Best, it becomes equivalently true that it's pefect in its own state. Since nothing Perfect can ever exist, or as wisely quoth that there's no corner of perfection and room for perfection, the Best only brings out the disillusions of what's regarded as the Best.
Even if we believethat the Best does exist. Now what next after being the Best. The Best leaves no room for improvements. Thence from being the Best one can only grow Better and with no chance to ameliorate furthur, wherefore Best is nothing more than a tenacious folly.
Now considering something to be Better, being Better it provides a ground room for improvements and to ameliorate further, say from Better to Better++. Regarding such infinetesimal ameliorations to Better would still leave it at Better, narrowing the by far margin from Best. Thence the destiny of Better is Better itself and not the Best.
Philosophically considered, its always the human tendency to seek something that's better than the one possesed, no matter what one has or why one needs. Even if its the Best, one still looks up or rather desires (though not the need ) for something thats Better than the Best. To compare and collate the Need with the Absolute scale, and the Desire ( I wont say it as Greed) with the relative scale.
The absolute scale has an end but not the relative scale. Hence when the qualitative mensurations are quantified on a relative scale there can olny be a place for Better and not the Best.
posted by Sameer G Kulkarni @ 5/13/2005 09:08:00 AM
<< Home