<body><script type="text/javascript"> function setAttributeOnload(object, attribute, val) { if(window.addEventListener) { window.addEventListener('load', function(){ object[attribute] = val; }, false); } else { window.attachEvent('onload', function(){ object[attribute] = val; }); } } </script> <div id="navbar-iframe-container"></div> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://apis.google.com/js/platform.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript"> gapi.load("gapi.iframes:gapi.iframes.style.bubble", function() { if (gapi.iframes && gapi.iframes.getContext) { gapi.iframes.getContext().openChild({ url: 'https://www.blogger.com/navbar.g?targetBlogID\x3d10674855\x26blogName\x3dPhilosophers+Longueur+a+rara+avis\x26publishMode\x3dPUBLISH_MODE_BLOGSPOT\x26navbarType\x3dBLUE\x26layoutType\x3dCLASSIC\x26searchRoot\x3dhttps://sameergk.blogspot.com/search\x26blogLocale\x3den\x26v\x3d2\x26homepageUrl\x3dhttp://sameergk.blogspot.com/\x26vt\x3d314732955942430681', where: document.getElementById("navbar-iframe-container"), id: "navbar-iframe", messageHandlersFilter: gapi.iframes.CROSS_ORIGIN_IFRAMES_FILTER, messageHandlers: { 'blogger-ping': function() {} } }); } }); </script>

Thursday, May 05, 2005

Whorfian hypothesis of I

"For what I am, if I cant live for myself and what for am I, if I cant be anything other than myself."

Though at a glance, regardless of circumstances the two theories seem to be paradoxical, may be that they are one and the same at the bottom. Each in its extreme evolution hypothecates a great level of closeness, will to live, and the knowledge of life. Each upholds the theory of will, the will to seek, to seek the eternal mien and to deify one’s life. Be it the self-seeking or the self-denial, both supposes the life to be the rationale and act of self-conduct. Too simple a fact is that what one perceives or conceives is what the truth is.

Again Philosophically considered, thence the two theories or rather the two surmises seem au-fond interchangeable and alike, unlike that one happens to be seen in celestial radiance and the other in the dusky and lurid glow. One happens to be regarded as stoic and the other to be quiet cynical. One is accepted to be the real altruistic act and the other to be a mere cupid act.